<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/10451/2027" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://hdl.handle.net/10451/2027</id>
  <updated>2013-06-18T07:30:38Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2013-06-18T07:30:38Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Comparison of Mixture and Classification Maximum Likelihood Approaches in Poisson Regression Models</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/10451/4713" />
    <author>
      <name>Faria, Susana</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Soromenho, Gilda</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/10451/4713</id>
    <updated>2011-12-27T14:41:25Z</updated>
    <published>2008-08-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Comparison of Mixture and Classification Maximum Likelihood Approaches in Poisson Regression Models
Authors: Faria, Susana; Soromenho, Gilda
Abstract: In this work, we propose to compare two algorithms to compute maximum&#xD;
likelihood estimators of the parameters of a mixture Poisson regression models.&#xD;
To estimate these parameters, we may use the EM algorithm in a mixture&#xD;
approach or the CEM algorithm in a classification approach. The comparison of&#xD;
the two procedures was done through a simulation study of the performance of&#xD;
these approaches on simulated data sets in a target number of iterations. Simulation&#xD;
results show that the CEM algorithm is a good alternative to the EM algorithm&#xD;
for fitting Poisson mixture regression models, having the advantage of converging&#xD;
more quickly.</summary>
    <dc:date>2008-08-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

