<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/10451/2358" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://hdl.handle.net/10451/2358</id>
  <updated>2013-05-23T22:29:12Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2013-05-23T22:29:12Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Student-Centred Methods in Higher Education: Implications for Student Learning and Professional Development</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/10451/5552" />
    <author>
      <name>Simão, Ana Margarida Veiga</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Flores, Maria Assunção</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/10451/5552</id>
    <updated>2012-03-13T16:45:54Z</updated>
    <published>2010-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Student-Centred Methods in Higher Education: Implications for Student Learning and Professional Development
Authors: Simão, Ana Margarida Veiga; Flores, Maria Assunção
Abstract: This paper presents findings from two case studies carried out in two Portuguese universities&#xD;
in order to analyse and understand the implications of two participatory methods of teaching and&#xD;
learning: portfolio and project led-education. Case 1 involved the use of portfolio as a strategy for&#xD;
enhancing students’ self-regulated learning. Case 2 was a project-led course (one-year project) during&#xD;
which students were asked to design and develop a training course for a real/professional context for&#xD;
a real group of professionals in a given institution. Active and cyclical model of self-regulation&#xD;
learning occurs according to three phases: forethought, performance (volitional) control, and selfreflection;&#xD;
development of competencies (disciplinary and non-disciplinary); team work; and articulation&#xD;
university/professional context are some of the key features of these methods. Findings suggest a better&#xD;
understanding of teaching and learning dimensions at higher education, namely in regard to processes&#xD;
and outcomes of learning, skills development, and changes both conceptual and attitudinal. In the&#xD;
paper, students’ perceptions about participatory methods are discussed, as well as the factors that&#xD;
contribute to students’ active engagement and ways of promoting the effective use of these kinds&#xD;
methods. Overall, a number of dimensions were identified: i) the transition from a single towards a&#xD;
plural perspective; ii) the transition from a teaching-centred approach towards a learning-centred&#xD;
one; iii) the transition from discourse to action; iv) the transition from a an outcome approach to assessment&#xD;
towards a continuous and formative one; v) the transition from a disciplinary approach towards&#xD;
a cross-disciplinary one.
Description: An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 87th Annual Meeting of the American&#xD;
Educational Research Association (AERA), San Francisco, CA, USA, 7-11th April 2006</summary>
    <dc:date>2010-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Adult attachment style across individuals and role-relationships: Avoidance is relationship-specific, but anxiety shows greater generalizability</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://hdl.handle.net/10451/4315" />
    <author>
      <name>Moreira, João M., 1964-</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://hdl.handle.net/10451/4315</id>
    <updated>2011-10-19T12:39:42Z</updated>
    <published>2011-10-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Adult attachment style across individuals and role-relationships: Avoidance is relationship-specific, but anxiety shows greater generalizability
Authors: Moreira, João M., 1964-
Abstract: A generalisability study examined the hypotheses that avoidant attachment, reflecting the representation of others, should be more relationship-specific (vary across relationships more than across individuals), while attachment anxiety, reflecting self-representation, should be more generalisable across a person’s relationships. College students responded to 6-item questionnaire measures of these variables for 5 relationships (mother, father, best same-gender friend, romantic partner or best opposite-gender friend, other close person), on 3 (N = 120) or 2 (N = 77) occasions separated by a few weeks. Results supported the hypotheses, with the person variance component being larger than the relationship-specific component for anxiety, and the opposite happening for avoidance. Anxiety therefore seems not to be as relationship-specific as previous research suggested. Possible reasons for discrepancies between the current and previous studies are discussed.</summary>
    <dc:date>2011-10-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

