<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10451/2027">
    <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10451/2027</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10451/4713" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2013-05-25T12:49:20Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10451/4713">
    <title>Comparison of Mixture and Classification Maximum Likelihood Approaches in Poisson Regression Models</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10451/4713</link>
    <description>Title: Comparison of Mixture and Classification Maximum Likelihood Approaches in Poisson Regression Models
Authors: Faria, Susana; Soromenho, Gilda
Abstract: In this work, we propose to compare two algorithms to compute maximum&#xD;
likelihood estimators of the parameters of a mixture Poisson regression models.&#xD;
To estimate these parameters, we may use the EM algorithm in a mixture&#xD;
approach or the CEM algorithm in a classification approach. The comparison of&#xD;
the two procedures was done through a simulation study of the performance of&#xD;
these approaches on simulated data sets in a target number of iterations. Simulation&#xD;
results show that the CEM algorithm is a good alternative to the EM algorithm&#xD;
for fitting Poisson mixture regression models, having the advantage of converging&#xD;
more quickly.</description>
    <dc:date>2008-08-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

