Universidade de Lisboa Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa

Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa >
Instituto de Medicina Molecular (IMM) >
IMM - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10451/6227

Título: Skin antiseptics in venous puncture-site disinfection for prevention of blood culture contamination : systematic review with meta-analysis
Autor: Caldeira, D.
David, C.
Sampaio, C.
Palavras-chave: Antiseptics
Blood culture
Chlorhexidine
Iodine
Meta-analysis
Skin
Issue Date: 2011
Editora: WB Saunders
Citação: Journal of Hospital Infection 77 (2011) 223-232
Resumo: Blood cultures drawn by venous puncture are common clinical procedures for the detection of bacteraemia. Blood culture contamination (BCC) can lead to clinical misinterpretation and unnecessary expenses. We aimed to systematically review randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with skin antiseptics for prevention of contamination in venous-puncture drawn blood cultures. We conducted database search using CENTRAL (Cochrane Library issue April 2010), MEDLINE, EMBASE and mRCT, in June 2010. All RCTs testing skin antiseptics in venous-puncture drawn blood cultures were retrieved. Relative risk (RR) of the BCC outcome was analysed by random effects method using confidence interval (CI) of 95%. Studies were assessed by one review author and checked by another. Six studies were identified. Single-trial comparisons showed that alcoholic iodine tincture was better than non-alcoholic povidone-iodine, and isopropyl/acetone/povidone-iodine showed superiority against isopropyl/povidone-iodine. Meta-analysis demonstrated that alcoholic chlorhexidine was better than non-alcoholic povidone-iodine (RR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.24–0.46) in 4757 blood cultures from two trials. Alcoholic solutions were better than non-alcoholic products (0.53; 0.31–0.90) in 21 300 blood cultures from four studies. Two trials with 13 418 blood cultures showed that iodine tincture was not superior to povidone-iodine in BCC prevention (0.79; 0.54–1.18). Alcoholic iodine was not different from non-alcoholic iodine (0.79; 0.53–1.17). Comparison of chlorhexidine vs iodine compounds was not conclusive. Alcohol alone was not inferior to iodinated products for prevention of contamination in venous-puncture drawn blood cultures. The association of alcohol and povidone-iodine did not seem to be useful. Alcoholic chlorhexidine solutions reduced blood culture false positives compared with aqueous povidone-iodine.
Descrição: Copyright © 2010 The Hospital Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
Arbitragem científica: yes
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10451/6227
doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2010.10.015
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670110004731
ISSN: 0195-6701
Appears in Collections:IMM - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Artigo.pdf937,89 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Restrict Access. You can request a copy!
Statistics
FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpaceOrkut
Formato BibTex mendeley Endnote Logotipo do DeGóis 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

  © Universidade de Lisboa / SIBUL
Alameda da Universidade | Cidade Universitária | 1649-004 Lisboa | Portugal
Tel. +351 217967624 | Fax +351 217933624 | repositorio@reitoria.ul.pt - Feedback - Statistics
DeGóis
  Estamos no RCAAP Governo Português separator Ministério da Educação e Ciência   Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia

Financiado por:

POS_C UE