Universidade de Lisboa Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa

Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa >
Faculdade de Letras (FL) >
Centro de Estudos Comparatistas (FL - CEComp) >
FL - CEComp - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10451/6794

Título: Polishing Papers for Publication: Palimpsests or Procrustean Beds?
Autor: McKenny, John
Bennett, Karen
Palavras-chave: academic discourse
humanities
Portuguese
English
research articles corpus
Issue Date: 2009
Editora: John Benjamins
Citação: McKenny John & Bennett, Karen.‘Critical and Corpus Approaches to English Academic Text Revision: A Case Study of Articles by Portuguese Humanities Scholars’. English Text Construction, 2.2. 2009. 228-245
Resumo: Portuguese academic discourse of the humanities is notoriously difficult to render into English, given the prevalence of rhetorical and discourse features that are largely alien to English academic style. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that some of those features might find their way into the English texts produced by Portuguese scholars through a process of pragmalinguistic and sociopragmatic transfer. If so, this would have important practical and ideological implications, not only for the academics concerned, but also for editors, revisers, teachers of EAP, translators, writers of academic style manuals and all the other gatekeepers of the globalized culture. The study involved a corpus of some 113,000 running words of English academic prose written by established Portuguese academics in the Humanities, which had been presented to a native speaker of English (professional translator and specialist in academic discourse) for revision prior to submission for publication. After correction of superficial grammatical and spelling errors, the texts were made into a corpus, which was tagged for Part of Speech (CLAWS7) and discourse markers (USAS) using WMatrix2 (Rayson 2003). The annotated corpus was then interrogated for the presence of certain discourse features using Wmatrix2 and Wordsmith 5 (Scott 2006), and the findings compared with those of a control corpus, Controlit, of published articles written by L1 academics in the same or comparable journals. The results reveal significant overuse of certain features by Portuguese academics, and a corresponding underuse of others, suggesting marked differences in the value attributed to those features by the two cultures.
Arbitragem científica: yes
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10451/6794
ISSN: 1874-8767, 1874-8775
Versão do Editor: http://benjamins.com/#catalog/journals/etc.2.2.06mck/details
Appears in Collections:FL - CEComp - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Polishing Papers Postprint.doc192 kBMicrosoft WordView/Open
Statistics
FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpaceOrkut
Formato BibTex mendeley Endnote Logotipo do DeGóis 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

  © Universidade de Lisboa / SIBUL
Alameda da Universidade | Cidade Universitária | 1649-004 Lisboa | Portugal
Tel. +351 217967624 | Fax +351 217933624 | repositorio@reitoria.ul.pt - Feedback - Statistics
DeGóis
Promotores do RCAAP   Financiadores do RCAAP

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia Universidade do Minho   Governo Português Ministério da Educação e Ciência PO Sociedade do Conhecimento (POSC) Portal oficial da União Europeia